If
there's one issue that haunts the Android "industry" it's the widely
discussed problem of fragmentation. Dozens of companies (Motorola, HTC,
etc.) make hundreds of Android models to be sold by numerous carriers,
in retail stores and online. There are differences in the phones -
different size screens, virtual or physical keyboards, price, etc.
Having choices is certainly appealing - with the iPhone it's black or
white, literally. However Android choices can be very confusing for
someone trying to find the "right" phone - like the potato chip aisle at
the quickstop - way too many choices.
In the case of the Android phones, the hardware may be capable of handling the upgrade but the handset makers and carriers - not Google -
control which phones will be upgraded and when. When you purchase any
smartphone, there is no promise of whether upgrades will be provided or
what they will include or cost. Apple has taken the highroad and
provides free upgrades to all devices immediately. The Android situation
is just the opposite. Some may not be upgraded at all and for those
that are upgradable, when it will happen varies widely. A ten second
look at the survey is all it takes to get the message.
Imagine if your one year old PC did not qualify
for the latest version of Windows.
This seems in some ways like the battle between Apple and Microsoft
for PC dominance but there is a significant difference. If
fragmentation in the PC world had been harmful, Apple would have been
the logical beneficiary because there were hundreds of PC manufacturers
over the years. But PCs were not all that different - they used the same
processors, the same disk drives, the same keyboards, etc. so
differences were either minor cosmetic factors or price. Most importantly they all ran the same operating system and most could be reliably upgraded for at least five years.
This meant buying one PC brand or another resulted in a generally similar outcome. Unfortunately this is where the comparison breaks down. Android based phones have a dismal record concerning upgradability.
This meant buying one PC brand or another resulted in a generally similar outcome. Unfortunately this is where the comparison breaks down. Android based phones have a dismal record concerning upgradability.
A recent survey sheds light on the situation in very graphic form. A long list of
Android phones has a horizontal bar beside each product name. The
beginning of the bar is color coded to indicate which version of Android
came with the device - green meaning latest version, yellow, one
version back and red, two versions back. Progressing to the right, the
bar color indicates the availability of upgrades on each model. Some
models begin with a green portion indicating the latest Android version
is factory installed but in other cases, the starting point is yellow -
meaning the phone ships with an old version of Android. That's like
buying a PC today with Windows Vista installed. Without even looking at the individual phones the
overall picture is shocking - generally green to the left but a sea of
yellow and red to the right - meaning one or two year old phones cannot
be upgraded. Imagine if your one year old PC did not qualify for the latest version of Windows.
No comments:
Post a Comment